IELTS HUBIELTS Discussion Essay on World & Education & Health
Full IELTS Writing Task 2
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
There are two main perspectives on how to address hunger globally. One group believes that education is the solution, while others think that providing food aid is the answer. It is important to consider both viewpoints.
In my opinion, I believe that education plays a crucial role in tackling hunger, but food aid is also necessary in certain situations.
Write at least 250 words.
Introduction
Introduce the two main perspectives on solving world hunger (education vs. food aid) and state the author's opinion (leans towards education).
Body Paragraph 1 View 1
Discuss the arguments for food aid. Points: offers immediate help, tackles hunger directly, can be quickly deployed during emergencies, can boost local economies by increasing demand for local food.
Body Paragraph 2 View 2
Discuss the arguments for education. Points: provides skills (e.g., in agriculture), increases production (new farming methods), encourages innovation and research (food technology, GM crops).
Conclusion
Compare the views, reiterate preference for education, summarize why education offers a more sustainable, long-term solution (improving farming productivity, promoting innovation).
Band 9 Sample Answer:
There are two main opinions on how to solve world hunger: some believe in education, while others support food aid. I personally lean more towards the idea that education is the key.
Those who support food aid as the main answer to hunger have good reasons. They say that food aid offers immediate help and directly tackles hunger. This viewpoint is strengthened by the fact that food aid can be quickly deployed during emergencies, reducing the impact of famine. They also argue that food aid can boost local economies by increasing demand for local food, which can indirectly lead to a long-term solution by increasing local farming.
However, I agree with those who see education as a powerful tool against hunger. Education, especially in agriculture, can give people the skills they need to grow more food. For example, farmers can learn new farming methods that can greatly increase crop production. Also, education can encourage innovation and research in food technology, leading to more sustainable and efficient food systems. The creation of genetically modified crops, which are more resistant to pests and diseases, supports this argument.
While the arguments for food aid can't be totally ignored, I believe that the case for education is stronger. The ability of education to improve farming productivity and promote innovation in food technology offers a more sustainable, long-term solution to the world hunger problem.
Band 7 Sample Answer:
There exists a dichotomy of views regarding the solution to global hunger, with one faction advocating for education as the panacea, while the other champions the cause of food aid. My inclination, however, leans towards the former perspective, that education holds the key.
Those who endorse food aid as the primary solution to hunger do so with valid reasoning. They argue that immediate relief is provided by food aid, which directly addresses the problem of hunger. This argument is further bolstered by the fact that food aid can be mobilized swiftly in response to crises, thereby mitigating the effects of famine. Additionally, they contend that food aid can stimulate local economies by creating demand for local food products. This, in turn, can lead to an increase in local agricultural production, thus indirectly contributing to a long-term solution.
Despite the aforementioned arguments, I align myself with those who believe in the power of education to combat hunger. Education, particularly in the field of agriculture, can equip individuals with the skills necessary to increase food production. For instance, farmers can learn modern farming techniques that can significantly boost crop yield. Moreover, education can foster innovation and research in food technology, which can lead to the development of more sustainable and efficient food systems. The advent of genetically modified crops, which are more resistant to pests and diseases, serves as a testament to this argument.
While the arguments in favor of food aid cannot be completely disregarded, it is my conviction that the strength of the case for education is more compelling. The potential of education to enhance agricultural productivity and to drive innovation in food technology presents a more sustainable and long-term solution to the global hunger crisis.