IELTS HUBIELTS Agree Disagree Essay on Work & Money
Full IELTS Writing Task 2
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Some people argue that all workers in an organization should have the same salary.
Do you agree or disagree?
Write at least 250 words.
Introduction
State the viewpoint that all workers should have the same salary and immediately state disagreement with this idea.
Body Paragraph 1 View 1
Argue against equal pay based on the concept of meritocracy. Pay should match skills, experience, and contributions to encourage productivity and excellence.
Body Paragraph 2 View 2
Argue against equal pay due to the varying complexity and responsibility of different roles within a company, using an example like CEO vs. entry-level.
Body Paragraph 3 Opinion (Optional If Integrated)
Argue against equal pay because it would devalue professional growth and career advancement, potentially reducing motivation and hindering innovation.
Conclusion
Summarize the main arguments against equal pay (meritocracy, different roles/responsibilities, career progression) and reiterate the disagreement.
Band 9 Sample Answer:
There's a viewpoint that supports equal pay for all employees in a company, but I strongly disagree with this idea.
The first argument against equal pay is based on the concept of meritocracy. This idea, crucial in any competitive business setting, argues that pay should match a person's skills, experience, and contributions to the company. By giving higher salaries to top performers, businesses can encourage productivity and promote a culture of excellence.
Secondly, the varying complexity and responsibility of different roles in a company require different levels of pay. For example, a CEO, who is responsible for guiding the entire company towards its strategic goals, needs a high level of expertise, experience, and decision-making skills. Therefore, it would be unfair to pay them the same as an entry-level employee, who has less responsibility and requires less experience.
Thirdly, having the same salary for everyone would devalue professional growth and career advancement. If a junior engineer and a senior engineer were paid the same, it would reduce the junior engineer's motivation to learn new skills and move up the career ladder. This could potentially halt innovation and growth within the company.
In conclusion, I stand firm against the idea of equal pay for all employees in a company. This is due to the significance of meritocracy, the different complexities and responsibilities of various roles, and the importance of a clear career progression and professional development path.
Band 7 Sample Answer:
There exists a school of thought that advocates for uniform remuneration across all levels of an organization's workforce. I find myself in complete disagreement with this perspective.
The first contention against equal pay for all employees lies in the principle of meritocracy. This principle, which is fundamental to any competitive business environment, posits that remuneration should reflect an individual's skills, experience, and contributions to the organization. By rewarding high performers with higher salaries, companies can incentivize productivity and foster a culture of excellence.
Secondly, the complexity and responsibility associated with different roles within an organization necessitate varying compensation. A CEO, for instance, shoulders the responsibility of steering the entire organization towards its strategic goals, a task that demands a high level of expertise, experience, and decision-making skills. Consequently, it would be unjust to equate the remuneration of such a role with that of an entry-level position, which typically involves less responsibility and requires less experience.
Thirdly, a uniform salary structure would undermine the value of professional growth and career progression. For example, if a junior engineer and a senior engineer were to receive the same salary, it would diminish the motivation for the junior engineer to acquire new skills and ascend the career ladder. This could potentially stagnate innovation and growth within the organization.
In conclusion, I maintain my stance against the proposition of equal salaries for all workers in an organization. The reasons being, the importance of meritocracy, the varying complexities and responsibilities associated with different roles, and the need for a clear path of career progression and professional growth.