IELTS Agree Disagree Essay on Culture & World

Many people believe that English should be the only global language. While I agree that English should be a worldwide language, I don't think it should be the only one.

It's clear and beneficial that English is a global language for several reasons. First, it serves as a common language, making it easier for people from different language backgrounds to communicate. This is shown by its common use in international meetings, where people from different countries can talk and understand each other. Second, English is the main language of science, technology, and business. This not only improves global cooperation in these areas but also speeds up the sharing of knowledge and innovation, as we saw in the quick worldwide response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

However, the idea that English should be the only language used globally is not without issues. One problem is the rich cultural diversity found in languages, which could be threatened by having only one global language. For example, the Inuit language has many words for snow, showing their special relationship with their environment, a detail that could be lost if translated into English. Another issue is the possible marginalization of people who don't speak English. This could lead to social exclusion and inequality, as we see in countries where people who speak minority languages often face disadvantages in education and work.

In conclusion, while I support the idea that English should be a global language because of its role as a common language and its importance in key sectors, I don't agree with it being the only global language. This is due to the potential loss of cultural diversity and the danger of marginalizing people who don't speak English.

The notion that English should be the solitary global language is a perspective held by many. While I concur that English should be a global language, I contest the assertion that it should be the only one.

The prevalence of English as a global language is undeniable and advantageous for several reasons. Firstly, it acts as a lingua franca, facilitating communication between individuals of diverse linguistic backgrounds. This is exemplified by its widespread use in international conferences, where delegates from different countries can converse and understand each other. Secondly, English is the dominant language of science, technology, and business. This dominance not only enhances global collaboration in these fields but also accelerates the dissemination of knowledge and innovation, as seen in the rapid global response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

However, the proposition that English should monopolize linguistic communication globally is problematic. One reason is the rich cultural diversity encapsulated in languages, which would be jeopardized by linguistic homogeneity. For instance, the Inuit language has multiple words for snow, reflecting their unique interaction with their environment, a nuance that could be lost in English translation. Another reason is the potential marginalization of non-English speakers. This could lead to social exclusion and inequality, as seen in countries where linguistic minorities are often disadvantaged in education and employment.

In conclusion, while I uphold the view that English should be a global language due to its role as a lingua franca and its dominance in key sectors, I oppose the idea of it being the sole global language. This is because of the potential erosion of cultural diversity and the risk of marginalizing non-English speakers.