IELTS HUBIELTS Discussion Essay on Nature & Family & Education
Full IELTS Writing Task 2
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
most agree that we should be training children to recycle waste to preserve the Earth's natural resources. However, some believe that it is parents who should teach their children to recycle waste while others feel schools are more responsible.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Write at least 250 words.
Introduction
Introduce the two main viewpoints on who should teach children to recycle (parents vs. schools) and state the author's opinion (schools are more responsible).
Body Paragraph 1 View 1
Present the view that parents should teach recycling. Points: Parents set examples as main caregivers (kids copy); recycling integrated into daily home tasks becomes lifelong habit.
Body Paragraph 2 View 2
Present the view that schools should teach recycling and justify own opinion. Points: Schools have facilities/resources for complete education (e.g., visits to plants); schools can include recycling in curriculum ensuring consistent education for all.
Body Paragraph 3 Opinion (Optional If Integrated)
Opinion is integrated into introduction and Body Paragraph 2.
Conclusion
Summarize the arguments for both sides and restate the strong belief that schools are better prepared with resources and curriculum to provide comprehensive, consistent education.
Band 9 Sample Answer:
In the debate about environmental conservation, there are two main viewpoints: one group believes that parents should teach their kids to recycle, while the other thinks that schools should take on this role. I personally agree with the latter, that schools should be the main educators in teaching kids to recycle.
Those who support the idea of parents teaching recycling have strong reasons. First, they say that parents, as the main caregivers, can set an example of sustainable behavior. This is shown by the fact that kids often copy their parents' actions, so if parents recycle regularly, their kids are likely to do the same. Second, they argue that recycling can be easily included in daily home tasks, making it a regular practice. This is supported by the fact that tasks learned and practiced at home, like recycling, often become lifelong habits.
However, I side with those who think that schools should be the main educators in recycling. The first reason is that schools have the facilities and resources to provide a complete education on recycling. For example, schools can arrange visits to recycling plants, giving students a direct experience of the recycling process, which parents might find difficult to provide. Second, schools can include recycling in their curriculum, ensuring that all students, regardless of their home situation, receive the same level of education on this important issue. This is highlighted by the fact that not all parents have the knowledge or time to teach their kids about recycling, so leaving it to schools guarantees a consistent standard of education on this topic.
In conclusion, while there are good arguments for parents teaching their kids to recycle, I strongly believe that schools, with their resources and curriculum, are better prepared to take on this job, ensuring a comprehensive and consistent education on recycling for all students.
Band 7 Sample Answer:
In the discourse of environmental preservation, there exists a dichotomy of opinions: one faction posits that parents should inculcate the habit of recycling in children, while the other advocates for schools to shoulder this responsibility. I am inclined towards the latter view, that schools should play a pivotal role in teaching children to recycle waste.
Those who champion the role of parents in teaching recycling have cogent reasons for their stance. Firstly, they argue that parents, being the primary caregivers, are in a unique position to model sustainable behavior. This argument is exemplified by the fact that children often emulate their parents' actions, thus if parents recycle diligently, their children are likely to follow suit. Secondly, they contend that recycling can be seamlessly integrated into daily household chores, thereby making it a routine practice. This point is further bolstered by the observation that tasks learned and practiced at home, such as recycling, often become ingrained habits that persist into adulthood.
Despite the aforementioned arguments, I align myself with those who believe that schools should be the primary educators in recycling. The first reason for this is that schools have the infrastructure and resources to provide comprehensive education on recycling. For instance, schools can organize field trips to recycling plants, thereby giving students a first-hand experience of the recycling process, which is something that parents might struggle to provide. Secondly, schools can incorporate recycling into the curriculum, thereby ensuring that all students, irrespective of their home environment, receive the same level of education on this crucial issue. This argument is underscored by the fact that not all parents have the knowledge or time to teach their children about recycling, thus leaving it to schools ensures a uniform standard of education on this matter.
In conclusion, while there are valid arguments for parents teaching their children to recycle, I firmly believe that schools, with their resources and curriculum, are better equipped to undertake this task, thereby ensuring a thorough and uniform education on recycling for all students.