Full IELTS Writing Task 2
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Some people believe that big international sporting events are not worth for most countries.
Do you agree or disagree?
Write at least 250 words.
Paraphrase view that events are not good. State strong disagreement and belief they greatly benefit the host nation.
Topic sentence: Economic advantages. Points: Tourist income for local businesses, infrastructure investment benefiting locals.
Topic sentence: Opportunity to display culture and heritage. Points: Increases tourism interest, improves international reputation and diplomatic ties.
Topic sentence: Encourages national pride and unity. Points: Shared support reinforces connection and identity, athlete success motivates youth and healthy lifestyle.
Restate strong belief in benefits. Summarize main points: economic growth, culture promotion, and national unity.
In the public's view, some think that hosting big international sports events isn't good for most countries. I strongly disagree with this idea, as I believe these events greatly benefit the host nation.
My first point is based on the economic advantages these events usually bring. The arrival of tourists for the event leads to more income for local businesses, enhancing the economy. Also, the need for better infrastructure to host these visitors often results in substantial investment in public facilities, which benefits the local people in the long run.
Secondly, these events offer a unique opportunity for the host country to display its culture and heritage to the world. This exposure can increase interest in the country as a tourist spot, further improving its economy. Plus, the positive image portrayed can improve the country's international reputation, encouraging diplomatic ties.
Lastly, hosting international sports events often encourages a feeling of national pride and unity. The shared support for the home team can reinforce the connection among citizens, promoting a sense of national identity. Also, the success of local athletes can motivate younger generations to engage in sports, encouraging a healthy lifestyle.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that hosting international sports events is very beneficial for countries. The economic growth, the chance to promote culture, and the promotion of national unity are strong arguments that highlight the importance of these events.
In the realm of public opinion, there exists a belief that hosting large-scale international sporting events is not beneficial for most nations. I wholeheartedly disagree with this assertion, viewing such events as a significant boon for the host country.
My first argument rests on the economic benefits that these events invariably bring. The influx of tourists attending the event results in increased revenue for local businesses, boosting the economy. Moreover, the need for improved infrastructure to accommodate these visitors often leads to significant investment in public facilities, which has long-term benefits for the local population.
Secondly, these events provide an unparalleled platform for the host nation to showcase its culture and heritage on a global stage. This exposure can lead to increased interest in the country as a tourist destination, further bolstering its economy. Additionally, the positive image projected can enhance the nation's standing in the international community, fostering diplomatic relationships.
Lastly, the hosting of international sporting events often inspires a sense of national pride and unity. The collective support for the home team can strengthen the bond among citizens, fostering a sense of national identity. Furthermore, the success of local athletes can inspire younger generations to participate in sports, promoting a healthy lifestyle.
In conclusion, I firmly maintain that hosting international sporting events is highly advantageous for countries. The economic boost, the opportunity for cultural promotion, and the fostering of national unity are compelling arguments that underscore the value of these events.