Paraphrase topic (access/free higher education). State agreement with access but disagreement with it being free.
It is a widely held belief that tertiary education should be universally accessible and free of charge. While I concur with the notion that higher education should be accessible to all, I contest the assertion that it should be universally free.
Topic sentence: Benefits of making higher education available. Points: Helps social mobility & equal chances, creates fair society & educated workforce, encourages learning & innovation.
The democratization of higher education is a laudable goal, primarily because it promotes social mobility. By making tertiary education available to everyone, regardless of their socio-economic background, we can level the playing field and provide equal opportunities for success. This not only fosters a more equitable society, but also stimulates economic growth by cultivating a well-educated workforce. A second reason for supporting this view is that it can stimulate intellectual curiosity and innovation. When financial constraints are removed, individuals are more likely to pursue fields of study that align with their passions and interests, thereby fostering creativity and innovation.
Topic sentence: Problems with making higher education free. Points: Huge financial burden on taxpayers, potential for misuse & unbalanced workforce.
However, the proposition that higher education should be universally free is problematic. Firstly, it overlooks the significant financial burden this would place on taxpayers. The cost of providing free tertiary education to all would be astronomical and could lead to increased taxes or cuts in other vital public services. This point is further underscored when considering the potential for misuse. If higher education were universally free, it could lead to an oversupply of graduates in certain fields and an undersupply in others, resulting in an imbalanced workforce.
Summarize main points (benefits of access, problems with free). Restate overall stance (agree with access, disagree with free).
In conclusion, while I support the idea of making higher education accessible to all due to its potential to promote social mobility and stimulate innovation, I disagree with the notion of universally free tertiary education because of the significant financial burden it would place on taxpayers and the potential for misuse leading to an imbalanced workforce.
