IELTS HUB
Agree or disagree GovernmentCrimeSociety Essay #319
Writing Task 2

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic:

Some countries are considering imposing curfews in which teenagers will not be allowed outdoors at night unless they are accompanied by an adult.

To what extent Do you agree or disagree with this policy?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

Use the plan, then compare with Band 9.
256 words · 5 paragraphs
Introduction

State topic about teenage curfews. State strong agreement with the policy and mention it helps solve societal problems.

In the contemporary world, there is a growing consensus that adolescents should be subjected to curfews, requiring them to be accompanied by an adult during nocturnal hours. I wholeheartedly concur with this proposition, as it can potentially mitigate numerous societal issues.

Body 1 · View 1

First reason for agreement: Decrease youth crime. Explain that it lessens chances of illegal activities (vandalism, drug use). Explain that adult presence prevents peer pressure and bad choices.

Firstly, such a policy may significantly reduce juvenile delinquency, which often occurs under the cloak of darkness. A curfew would limit the opportunities for teenagers to engage in illicit activities, such as vandalism or substance abuse. Furthermore, the presence of an adult, who is presumably more responsible, could deter them from succumbing to peer pressure and making poor decisions.

Body 2 · View 2

Second reason for agreement: Improve the safety of teenagers. Explain that nighttime risks (accidents, crimes) are dangerous. Explain that adult supervision ensures safety and peace of mind.

Secondly, the implementation of a curfew could enhance the safety of adolescents. The night-time often harbours risks such as accidents or criminal activities, which could pose a threat to unaccompanied teenagers. By mandating adult supervision, we could ensure that teenagers are protected from these potential dangers, thereby providing peace of mind to their parents and society at large.

Body 3 · Opinion

Third reason for agreement: Help build stronger family relationships. Explain that extra time together leads to meaningful talks and shared moments, improving the bond. Explain it teaches adults responsibility in their children's development.

Lastly, this policy could foster stronger familial bonds. The additional time spent together could facilitate meaningful conversations and shared experiences, thus strengthening the relationship between teenagers and their parents or guardians. Moreover, it could also instil a sense of responsibility in adults, encouraging them to actively participate in their children's upbringing and development.

Conclusion

Summarize the main points (reduce crime, increase safety, strengthen relationships). Restate strong agreement with the policy and highlight benefits for individual and society.

In conclusion, I firmly support the imposition of curfews for teenagers, as it could curb juvenile delinquency, enhance their safety, and foster familial bonds. These compelling arguments underscore the necessity of such a policy, which could have far-reaching benefits for both the individual and society.

Go further with the books

Writing Task 2

100 Essential IELTS Essays

Band 9 Sample Answers for the Real Exam

₹199$6.99CAD 8.99AUD 9.99£4.99NZD 10.99€5.99AED 24SGD 8.99

Free preview

Grammar

Functional Grammar for Task 2

Grammar that earns marks in IELTS Writing

₹299$9.99CAD 13.99AUD 14.99£7.99NZD 16.99€8.99AED 39SGD 12.99

Free preview

Kit · 3 books + 1 marked essay

Writing 7 Kit

The strategy to break the 6.5 ceiling, the mistakes that cost marks, the vocabulary that lifts Lexical Resource, then one essay marked to check you are there.

₹799$26.99CAD 37.99AUD 39.99£20.99NZD 45.99€23.99AED 99SGD 34.99 ₹1,296$43.96CAD 60.96AUD 65.96£33.96NZD 73.96€38.96AED 166SGD 56.96

Next question: In many situations, people who break the law should be warned instead of punished. To what extent Do you agree or disagree?