Paraphrase the topic (two views on national borders disappearing vs. remaining). State author's opinion (borders will remain and are necessary).
In the realm of international relations, some envision a future devoid of national borders, while others staunchly maintain that such demarcations will persist indefinitely. I align myself with the latter perspective, asserting the enduring necessity of national borders.
Discuss the view that borders might disappear. Topic sentence: reasons based on global unity and economic integration. Point 1: Global unity/cooperation (EU example). Point 2: Economic integration/growth (Singapore example).
Those who advocate for a borderless world have their reasons, primarily rooted in the ideals of global unity and economic integration. They argue that the dissolution of borders would foster a global sense of community, breaking down divisive national identities and promoting international cooperation. To extend this point, consider the European Union, where member states have largely eliminated borders, facilitating cultural exchange and mutual understanding. Additionally, proponents of this view contend that open borders would stimulate global trade, leading to economic prosperity. This argument is substantiated by the economic boom experienced by countries that have liberalized their trade policies, such as Singapore, which has become a global financial hub due to its open economy.
Discuss the view that borders will remain and justify author's opinion. Topic sentence: reasons based on security and cultural identity. Point 1: Security against threats (Israel example). Point 2: Preservation of cultural identity (Japan example).
However, despite these arguments, I concur with those who believe in the permanence of national borders, primarily due to security concerns and the preservation of cultural identity. National borders serve as a crucial line of defense against potential threats, ensuring the safety and security of a country's citizens. For instance, countries like Israel maintain strict border controls to mitigate the risk of terrorism. Furthermore, borders help preserve a nation's unique cultural identity, preventing it from being diluted by global homogeneity. Japan, for example, has managed to retain its distinct cultural heritage while still engaging in international relations, largely due to its well-defined national borders.
Summarize arguments for both views. Restate author's opinion (keeping borders is more convincing due to security and cultural identity).
In conclusion, while the notion of a borderless world presents compelling arguments centered around global unity and economic prosperity, I believe the case for maintaining national borders, with their role in ensuring security and preserving cultural identity, holds greater weight.
