IELTS HUB
Agree or disagree CultureSociety Essay #592
Writing Task 2

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic:

Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than other ones.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

Use the plan, then compare with Band 9.
274 words · 4 paragraphs
Introduction

Introduce the topic of selective preservation of old buildings. State clear agreement.

The question of which historical structures should be protected from demolition is a subject of significant debate. I agree with the view that certain old buildings possess greater historical, architectural, or social value and should therefore be prioritized for preservation over others.

Body 1

Discuss historical significance. Explain why landmarks associated with major events provide more value than ordinary old structures.

The primary justification for selective preservation is the historical significance of a structure. Buildings that were the site of major historical events or were associated with influential figures serve as physical links to a nation's heritage. For example, a palace or a city hall from a pivotal era provides more educational and cultural value to the public than a mundane warehouse from the same period. By focusing resources on these significant landmarks, governments can ensure that the most important chapters of history are kept alive for future generations without spending excessive funds on less meaningful structures.

Body 2

Discuss architectural value and practicality. Argue that unique designs should be saved, while unremarkable or unsafe buildings can be replaced for modernization.

Furthermore, architectural uniqueness is a vital criterion for deciding which buildings to save. Some old structures are masterpieces of a particular style or utilize building techniques that have since been lost. Preserving these unique examples of craftsmanship adds to the aesthetic beauty of a city and provides inspiration for modern architects. However, if an old building is structurally unsound or represents a repetitive and unremarkable design, it may be more practical to replace it with modern housing or facilities that better serve the community's needs. This balanced approach allows cities to modernize while still protecting their most beautiful and unique assets.

Conclusion

Restate agreement. Summarize that historical and architectural importance should determine preservation efforts.

In conclusion, I agree that some old buildings are more worth saving than others. This is because structures with great historical meaning or unique architecture provide more value to society than common or unsafe buildings.

Go further with the books

Writing Task 2

100 Essential IELTS Essays

Band 9 Sample Answers for the Real Exam

₹199$6.99CAD 8.99AUD 9.99£4.99NZD 10.99€5.99AED 24SGD 8.99

Free preview

Writing Task 2

IELTS Essay Blueprint

Simple Steps to a High Score

₹299$9.99CAD 13.99AUD 14.99£7.99NZD 16.99€8.99AED 39SGD 12.99

Free preview

Kit · 3 books + 1 marked essay

Writing 7 Kit

The strategy to break the 6.5 ceiling, the mistakes that cost marks, the vocabulary that lifts Lexical Resource, then one essay marked to check you are there.

₹799$26.99CAD 37.99AUD 39.99£20.99NZD 45.99€23.99AED 99SGD 34.99 ₹1,296$43.96CAD 60.96AUD 65.96£33.96NZD 73.96€38.96AED 166SGD 56.96

Next question: In many cities, planners tend to arrange shops, schools, offices, and homes in specific areas and separate them from each other. Do you think the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages?